Skip to main content

Azure SQL Database Performance for different editions

As of now Azure allows creating SQL Databases in three tiers - Basic, Standard, and Premium.

The Basic tier has a single performance level with 5 DTU (Database Throughput Units)
The standard tier has three levels - S0 (10 DTU), S1 (20 DTU), and S2 (50 DTU).
And the Premium tier has also three levels - P1 (100 DTU), P2 (200 DTU), and P3 (800 DTU).

To compare performance I created a test database in each tier and performance level. The test itself is the same as the one used in one of my previous blogs:

The test was running from 5 clients for about 280 seconds and doing the following:
- drop and create the test table
- generate a random ID - integer within the [0, 2000000] range
- if a table has no row witch such ID then insert a new row
- if there is a row with such ID then update the row with the UpdateTime and a new DummyText (randomly generated length)


The results clearly show that the higher DTU the more transactions per second the database can handle.

Also it should be noticed that the databases in the Premium tier demonstrated very consistent results during the test but all other levels had a 5-10% variation in intermediate results (when compared with the final result reports after running the test for about 280 seconds).



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SQL 2014 performance - Local disk vs. Azure Blob vs. Azure VM attached disk

Today I decided to compare SQL 2014 (RTM) performance when running a test against  - a local database (created on  WD7500BPKT - 750 GB 7200 RPM)  - a DB created on a disk attached to the A3 (3 cores, 7 GB) VM in Azure - a DB created on an Azure blob The VM in Azure was created in the US East region using the SQL 2014 template from the gallary provided by Microsoft. All databases were created with a single 10 GB data file (10 GB) and 1GB  log file. On the local SQL instance the DB was created as CREATE DATABASE TestDBonLocal ON     (NAME = file_data1, FILENAME = 'C:\TEMP\filedata1.mdf', SIZE = 10GB, FILEGROWTH = 256 MB )  LOG ON  (NAME = file_log1, FILENAME = 'C:\TEMP\filelog1.ldf', SIZE = 1GB, FILEGROWTH = 32 MB)  On the Azure VM the database on the attached disk (the disk was mapped as drive F:) was created as such CREATE DATABASE TestDBonDisk ON     (NAME = file_data1, FILENAME = 'F:\TMP\filedat...
2 comments
Read more

Create 3-Node Windows 2012 Multi-subnet Cluster

Environment There are two Data centers connected via a WAN link. Two Windows 2012 Servers (called SQLDEV1 and SQLDEV2) are located in the Primary Data Center (on the IP subnet 192.168.79.0/24) and the third server is placed in the Secondary Data Center with the 192.168.69.0/24 subnet. We’ll be creating a three-node Windows cluster with no shared storage on the multi subnet network with a file share witness at the Primary Data Center. We’ll be using a file share witness to protect from the cluster failure in a situation when the network between the Data Centers is unavailable and one of the servers in the Primary Data Center is also down (or being rebooted). The final state will look like depicted above: -           Two Virtual IP’s will be assigned (192.168.76.218 and 192.168.69.134) to the cluster -           The servers at the Primary Data Center will have a vote (Vote=1) and the ...
2 comments
Read more

SQL 2012 AlwaysOn: Synchronous vs. Asynchronous commit. Performance impact

Recently I've had a chance to build a 3-server AlwaysOn environment distributed between the primary and secondary data centers. The configuration looks like this: Primary Data Center                         Secondary Data Center                        SQLDEV1                                        SQLDEV3          SQLDEV2 The availability group was crated with synchronous commit replicas on SQLDEV1 and SQLDEV2 and the replica on SQLDEV3 was configured for asynchronous commit. The link between the data centers was not great and when I pinged SQLDEV3 from SQLDEV1 I got these results Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:     Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 63ms, Average = 42ms I also created a very simp...
4 comments
Read more